Posted by
Steve on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:51:15 PM
Global warming has met its match. The video from England is now out and can be seen by all. It is on you-tube. The name is "The Great Global Warming Swindle". It was produced by some of the world's leading scientists on climate. In the video, they use actual facts and figures to support the idea that man caused global warming is a myth.
I watched a few pieces of it last night at work. The parts I watched were well done. They poked fun at Al Gore and his movie, "An Inconvenient Truth". They would play a portion of Al Gore's movie, then they would blow holes in his statements with facts and figures. It was very powerful and well done.
Unfortunately, the movie will not be seen by nearly as many people as saw the poorly scienced, "An Inconvenient Truth". That is a shame, Because, if more people saw the movie, they would understand that people who are supporting global warming are just trying to run your life for you. They are trying to lower your standard of living, while leaving theirs alone.
I discovered a quote at Newsmax.com. The quote is in the Phil Brennan column. The quote actually comes from Melanie Phillips (melaniephillips.com).
"Let me close with excerpts from Britain's enormously insightful Melanie Phillips in her March 13th blog (melaniephillips.com):
"The climate change truth-deniers — On BBC Radio Four's Today programme this morning, the Environment Secretary David Miliband, asked whether there was anything in last week's Channel Four documentary ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle', gave the following memorable reply: 'I didn't see the programme — but I promise you I will do a blog demolishing its contents.'
"This just about sums up the received wisdom on man-made global warming: conclusion first, evidence later. Miliband's reply was of a piece with the general response by the global warmers to the C4 film's evidence: it has either been ignored, or rubbished with some feeble arguments, or its production team has been subjected to character assassination. It is, of course, a response straight out of the Stalinist manual of propaganda and manipulation.
"The evidence that science — as opposed to the politicised version of it — does not support global warming theory has been obvious ever since this theory first burst upon us in the late 1980s. What is only now surfacing, however, is the evidence of the corruption of the processes being used to promote this scam and the intimidation of any scientists who try to tell the truth.
"For me, the most explosive revelations on the C4 film were scientists testifying to this corruption — from the vast amounts of grant money being used to create an entire global warming industry making it financially difficult for scientists not to produce ‘research' that supported the theory; to the falsification of the computer models in order to produce the alarmist predictions that would attract such funds; to the IPCC's deletion of crucial parts of the evidence that didn't fit the theory; to the circular argument that there was now a ‘consensus' on the theory among all the finest minds in science around the world.
"And let's not forget the astounding fact that the IPCC itself has said in terms that the scientific evidence for its fourth report —evidence which has not yet even been finalised — is to be brought into line with the ‘summary' of that evidence which was published last month. In other words, the ‘summary' was published before the evidence of which it was allegedly a reflection had even been finalised — and that evidence is to be changed to fit it if it deviates from what the summary said. Conclusion first, evidence later — or rather, evidence denied.""