Posted by
Steve on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:23:20 PM
This morning, I read an article in the Arizona Republic by a person who is supposed to be a scientist involved with climate. In the article, he states that the climate has gone up one degree Fahrenheit in the last 100 years. Rather than using it as the lack of a warning sign that it is, he said it is a warning sign. He then went on to say that the climate will warm up another 4-5 degrees in the next 50 years. He did not say next 50 years, he said by the middle of the 21st century. In my mind that is the same thing.
After building his case that we have no evidence of global warming, it means we will have dramatic global warming. To me, that makes no sense. If we have no evidence of global warming, why is the global warming problem going to be terrible? It would make scientific sense to say that we have no scientific evidence to prove global warming is a fact. Because we have no evidence of what is happening, we do not know what will happen in the future. It could be as bad as this. Or it may be something like this. That would be the scientifically valid thing to do. He only took the bad case scenario.
He then said that man was causing this dramatic increase in global warming. There is no evidence to prove that. Even he did not provide any evidence to prove it or even hint that it was true. He only said that the temperature was going up, therefore it must be because of the workings of man. That is a statement that would be difficult to defend. That would be like saying that because the sun came up today; it was because man did something. That would be stupid. Any scientist would blow holes through my example because we have proven that the sun comes up without the benefit of anything that man does. We have not proven whether the climate goes up or down with regard to anything that man does. For this scientist to say that it does is irresponsible.
The problem is that when you drink the global warming kool-aid, you have to make statements that are irresponsible. If you keep your statements to things that are scientific, you cannot prove global warming or make dire predictions. The whole purpose of talking about global warming is to make dire predictions. These dire predictions are always about 50 years in the future. They are far enough in the future that your predictions will be forgotten and you will not be around to be responsible for them.
But, the real purpose of the dire predictions and their solutions is to control the way people live. That has been the goal of the communists since Karl Marx. There has never been a way to completely control the way people live until now. We still cannot completely control the way people live, but we are coming close with the use of computers. Some time in the next few years (5-15) we will have the technology in place to effectively control every aspect of your life except for your biology. Then, the communists will have everything they want except for control of the US government.
They are trying to gain control of the US government with this election. The US communist party is effectively endorsing Barack Obama for President. They are effectively killing Mrs. Clinton, just like Lenin killed Trotsky. Mrs. Clinton has been a loyal supporter of the communist party for these many years. The communist party has no further use for Mrs. Clinton. They found someone who is even more like their ideology. She was trying to be too much of a centrist for their taste. Barack Obama is not trying to be anything except for a hard core leftist.
Global warming is nothing but a front for the communist party to take control of the governments of the world. The more governments buy into the global warming hoax, the more the communists can take power. Global warming is a hoax. There is no evidence to show that it is occurring or caused by man. Every time they say that it is caused by greenhouse gasses, they conveniently forget that nature produces 95%+ of the greenhouse gasses. How can our small percent be that percent that is causing global warming? There is no way. We could eliminate all of the man caused greenhouse gasses and the world would not even notice that they were missing.