More and more articles are coming out about the cooling period we are currently in. The period started in 1999 and is predicted to end around 2015. The article I read today had a chart that showed the most current periods. It had a 30 year cooling period between 1940 and 1970. Then, there was a warming period between 1970 and 1998. Then, there is the cooling period from 1998 to 2015. All this shows is that the climate is variable and that there is no emergency.

The global warming people are claiming that the emergency is still there. They are ignoring the data that there is a cooling period. According to them the ice caps are at their lowest level ever (they both are currently 14-30% larger than ever recorded). They continue to say that the temperature is rising. The temperature of the earth has not risen at all, not even one tenth of a degree since 1999. The temperature has cooled between 2002 and today.

But, the goal of the global warming people is not to save the planet. The goal of the global warming people is to establish a single government over the entire earth run by them. The government would be run using communist rules and regulations, but be environmentally friendly. Of course, every environmentalist believes that he/she would be part of the ruling class and not subject to the rules and regulations that they would establish for the “common” people. That is the way they live their lives today. Look at most of the environmentally conscious people in Hollywood and you see people that talk like they are serious environmentalists.  Yet, those same Hollywood types use energy like it is water. They want the masses to conserve, not them.

The global warming movement has become more of a religion than a scientific endeavor. They talk like they are in a religion. When they talk about the environment or global warming, they talk about believers or non-believers. They have their “prophet”, Al Gore.

In science, things are or are not. There is no such thing as a believer or non-believer about a scientific principle. A non-believer in a scientific principle is one that is challenging part of the premise behind the principle, not usually the principle itself. Take evolution for example, evolution on a short time period has been proven to work. The easiest example is a butterfly in England that was always white with black spots. After the industrial revolution, the butterfly became black with white spots. Both genomes were contained in both populations, just one or the other became dominant. That is evolution of a population on a short term basis. The problem with evolution is that it does not explain the origin of life. People that believe in evolution try to use it to explain the origin of life and are having problems. When they get to the edge of the science, they try to make it a religion. There are other ideas that explain the origin of life better than the theory of evolution. They are having difficulty being heard because of the orthodoxy that is being enforced on scientists by those that believe in evolution.

Global warming debates always start out talking about science as that is where the global warming people want the debate to be. They like to think that the theory of global warming is a scientific endeavor. When their science breaks down, they fall back to talking about faith and believers. They have their “hell” where the earth becomes uninhabitable. They throw all that out to try to scare you into believing in global warming. But, their science is not there and never has been there. They have fooled a lot of people into believing the hoax by painting a pretty picture of the future. They have lots of computer models that show that global warming will become horrible in the next 30-50 years. The article I read said you could enter random numbers into their computer and it would still generate their future. In other words, the computer models are flawed. They are based on non-science or bad science. When you base your computer model on flawed ideas, you get bad information out. Scientists have written articles about the fact that since we do not know everything about the climate, we just leave out the parts we do not understand when generating computer models. That is asking for inaccurate computer models. The computer models make the global warming believer look like they have science on their side. The non-believers also have computer models, but they do not show disaster. Disaster is always more interesting than a non-disaster.

It is difficult as a believer in science to get the word out. More and more people are questioning the entire premise behind the global warming hoax. It is easier to find articles about how global warming is a myth. That is refreshing to see. Unfortunately, the major news media believes Al Gore. It will take a while for enough people to understand that Al Gore is a false prophet before people discard his message.