Posted by
Steve on Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:02:28 AM
Barack Obama has picked the head of the Chicago public schools to head the Department of Education. That is a real bad choice. I just read that only 17% of Chicago school kids can read at or above grade level by the 8th grade. That is a terrible record. With a record like that the person should be fired, not promoted to a higher position.
The person to head the Department of Education should be a person that has promoted excellence in education, not failure. Of course, the Department of Education is an unnecessary federal department that has no usefulness, but that is another story for another day. Whoever heads the department should at least have led a successful education department somewhere in the United States. There must be someone in the United States who has led a successful education department somewhere. I am sure that Obama’s team could find that person if they tried hard enough.
One reason that Obama might have tapped the Chicago schools leader is that Obama and Ayers introduced their Fabian Socialism into the schools through the Chicago/Annenberg Challenge period. That means that the Chicago schools have been teaching socialism in their schools for about 15 years. That is plenty of time to have raised a generation of socialists. Obama probably would like to do the same for the rest of the United States. Unfortunately, there are plenty of teachers that think that socialism is the way the United States should go.
The problem with most of the major inner city schools is that they are failing. This includes: New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, St. Louis, Atlanta & Philadelphia. There are others, but those are the largest and they are all terrible at best. To choose one of the leaders from one of those places is a bad choice. When the schools are falling apart and the students not being taught at grade level, there is a problem. The person in charge should have identified that problem and be working to solve those problems. The problem is that no school administrator, except for Washington, D.C., is trying to actually solve the problems. They are all just going along to get along and Obama selects one of them. That says a lot about the priority that Obama will put on education during the next four years.
To give Obama an opportunity to make amends, I will assume that in making this selection, he was distracted by the Blagojevich situation. If that is the case, I would expect him to pull this selection back in the next few days and replace this bad selection with one that reflects a desire to see excellence in education instead of failure in education that he has endorsed. But, Democrats usually do not want excellence in education. An educated population will never pick socialism. An educated population will never go for the things that Democrats usually want to do. So, that is usually why Democrats are against improving education. They are always for spending more on education. They just do not want to improve what education we have. They just want to spend more to get more of what we already get. I know that makes no sense. But if you are reading this, you are educated and are probably not a Democrat.
As an educator, I try hard to provide my students with an excellent education. I will be the first to admit that I am not perfect. I make mistakes. I sometimes do or say things that in retrospect I wish I had not said or done. But, overall, I try hard to give my students the best education I can provide in the time they are with me. I am a science teacher and concentrate on the science. I sometimes get worried about the poor quality of work that my students turn in for research papers. The English is frequently bad. The sourcing of articles is done poorly. The citations in the back of the paper are done wrong. The citations in the back can be done with a website that will do it in the proper format for you. There is no reason to do it wrong. We have a learning center on campus that will go over their papers with them and almost write it for them when it is all said and done. Yet, I get terribly written papers all the time. That is a product of the poor education that they received before they came to my class.
I can say with satisfaction that students that succeed with me will also succeed in the courses that follow my course. Those that get an A or a B with me will usually get an A or a B all the way through the next three courses. Those courses are much more difficult than my introductory course. But, I think that it is because I prepared them well that the students do so well in the later classes.