About Me

Name:Steve
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Are we serious about Life?

Posted by Steve on Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:58:05 AM
When I turn on the TV, I am touched by the image that we are not serious. The top shows seem to be things like American Idol. That is nothing but fluff. People go on that show in the hope that they become famous and make millions. Most end up on that show making fools of themselves. Why would anyone go on a TV show to make a fool of themselves. I am baffled by the mindset that allows someone to do that to themselves.

We are in the middle of a war for our very survival. The Islamo-fascists want us converted to Islam or dead. Since most of us are not going to convert to Islam voluntarily, that means they want us dead. To have that sort of a problem looking us in the face it is hard to understand the fluff that goes on in American entertainment. I understand that we have to have entertainment. We need to get away from our worries and cares. The problem I see in front of me is that we have become obsessed with entertainment. We are becoming like the ancient Romans just prior to their fall.

Ancient Rome built itself up into a great culture. As the culture grew, the need for entertainment grew. The entertainment became more and more important to the people. People were obsessed with entertainment to get away from the realities of life. When the Celtic people invaded, they were able to march into Rome itself. The people had lost the ability to defend themselves. Are we becoming like those ancient Romans?

Our army is the best in the world. There is no force that can stand and win against us, unless we let them. That is what I see happening in Iraq. We have tied our troops up in knots with rules of engagement. When we find the enemy, we are more concerned with protecting civilians than killing the enemy. If we allow our soldiers to do their jobs, they could finish in Iraq within two months. They could finish off Iran and Syria before the end of the year. But, we will not let them loose. We are so afraid of what the liberals will think.

I wonder if America has the will to survive. The culture seems to be obsessed with entertainment. I wonder if my grandchildren or great grandchildren will even have an America to live in when they are my age. The Islamo-fascists are deadly serious. We are not serious. Most Americans do not believe that we are in a war. Most Americans think that if we are nice to the Islamo-fascists they will be nice to us. That could not be further from the truth. We have to fight. We have to win. We cannot fail. The big question is: how do we get people to understand that we are in a real war? What will it take to wake up the American people? Do thousands or even millions have to die before we wake up? I hope I am wrong. I hope that everyone understands and I am just misunderstanding. I fear I am right.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iranian Detainees

Posted by Steve on Saturday, January 13, 2007 2:52:03 AM
Just before President Bush spoke the other night, he authorized a raid on a building owned by Iran. The Marines that made the raid detained six Iranians and lots of papers and computer equipment. The Iranians claimed the building was an embassy. The US claims it was just another building.

It was good to make a move against the Iranians. They have gotten away with killing our men and women and financing others to do the same. It was time to catch them in the act of doing just that. When we translate and decode all of the information taken in the raid, we will have a better idea of exactly what Iran is up to in Iraq. That information is invaluable to the President and others planning our national security. It is of no use to the Democrats. They surrendered months or years ago.

When we know exactly what is what, we can plan exactly what responses to make. This information will provide us information about more than just what is going on in Iraq. It should also give good information about what is going on in Iran. We need good information about what is going on in Iran. This will give us some good data. It will be unfiltered through spies. It will have to be interpreted. I just hope that those doing the interpreting will do it right. We cannot afford mistakes.

Whoever came up with this idea deserves a medal. The plan is a winner on every front. Even if we have to give the Iranians back (doubtful), we still win from the information obtained. This shows me that President Bush is serious about winning in Iraq and the war on Islamo-fascism. I hope the next President is as committed to victory as President Bush. Of course, saying that means no Democrat can meet that test. All the Democrats that can be nominated will have surrendered. That means the next President has to be a Republican.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat Opposition to President

Posted by Steve on Friday, January 12, 2007 12:39:23 AM
The Democrats are none too happy about the President's speech. They do not want to see more troops sent to Iraq. They want the troops brought home. It was not too long ago that the Democrats thought they needed to sound like hawks. They were saying that we needed more troops in Iraq. We could not complete our mission without a increase in the number of troops in Iraq. Today, that has all changed for the worse.

There is one thing you can count on in these times. That is that the Democrat party will be against anything that will help the United States win the war against Islamo-fascism. The Democrats want George Bush to look so bad that they are willing to have America defeated in a war. That position is insane. If you are an American and claim to be a patriot, you have to want the US to win any war. The Democrats do not want us to win.

The most insane portion of the whole affair is that the American public is trusting the Democrats to find a way to win the war against Islamo-fascists. How can someone who wants us to lose find a way to win? They have no reason to look for any way to win. Their primary supporters want us to lose. The people that give them money to run campaigns want us to lose. It is the average American voter that was fooled in the voting booth. The average voter thought there was no difference between the two parties. How wrong can they be?

The election was only two months ago and already we see the Democrats trying to help us lose. I am just sick about how things are working out with this congress. We can do better than this. Unfortunately, we are stuck with these idiots for the next two years.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President's speech

Posted by Steve on Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:53:13 AM
This evening, President Bush gave a speech about the War on Terror. In the speech, he discussed increasing our commitment to the Iraq portion of that war by over 21,000 troops. These troops would be used to restore order in Bagdad. 

Any country that is trying to become independent has to have a secure capitol city. Right now, Bagdad is not a secure city. There are killings and bombings going on all the time by terrorists. It is important that we restore order to Bagdad. We can do that by increasing our presence in the city and increasing the Iraqi military presence in the city. 

Just increasing our military presence in the city will not restore order. We have to take a more aggressive stance toward the terrorists that are in Bagdad. This means taking off some of the chains that have restricted our military from truly doing its job these past couple of years. We need to play the game to win. We cannot play the game to be PC. We have to take the stance that we are going to be the winners. If there are innocents killed while pursuing the terrorists, so be it. We do not want to kill civilians. We are not targeting civilians. It is just sometimes difficult to tell the difference between a civilian and a terrorist until it is too late. 

We need to allow our troops to seek out and destroy the terrorists wherever they are. We should be attacking them 24 hours a day. We should not be giving the terrorists any breaks in this battle. We should give ourselves all the advantages. We should make the terrorists life a living hell. We should make them either give up or die. Seek them out and destroy them should be all our troops have to worry about. They should not have to worry about who did they kill. As long as they had any reason to suspect the people were terrorists, they should be able to kill them. No questions should be asked and no mercy given to them. I want the terrorists to worry about their lives 24 hours a day. That will sap morale and make our job easier.

I endorse the goals the President set forth. The country needs to get behind him and support our troops. The Democrats want to surrender. This surge in troops will not sit well with them. If this works as well as it can, the Democrats will have supported the wrong horse again. They are already screaming that the President is right and they will not stand for it. The Democrats only look good when the country looks bad. That is terrible. I support the US. I want what is best for the US. I cannot support any Democrat that does not support our country. Right now, that is almost 100% of the Democrats that hold elected leadership positions. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illegal Immigrants

Posted by Steve on Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:22:30 AM
On Monday, we had our first meeting of the semester. At the meeting, our college president discussed some of the implications of the elections. The biggest was prop. 300. Prop. 300 denies benefits to anyone that cannot document that they are here in Arizona legally. The benefits that impact the college are that we have to charge out of state tuition to any person who is in the United States illegally.

Since my college is located in a part of town that is largely black and hispanic, our enrollment is largely black and hispanic. Many of the hispanic students have been undocumented aliens. Many of these undocumented aliens are children of people who came here illegally. They have lived their entire known life in the US. They went through school in Arizona. In the past, we treated these students the same as any other Arizona resident. With prop. 300, these students now become out of state students.

Our college president made a political statement during the meeting. He said that he did not agree with prop. 30. He felt that things were fine as they had been. In my opinion, he was talking about enrollment issues. With prop. 300, our enrollment has dropped. If our enrollment continues this drop, we will have to sustain budget cuts. My college is rather small. Our FTSE is 1807. That means we have the equivalent of 1807 full time students on campus. Since most of our students are part-time, our actual enrollment is above the FTSE level.

The actual drop this semester is only about 50 FTSE. That translates to a lot of students when you figure the part-time enrollment situation of most of our students. If we cannot bring our enrollment up, we stand to lose about $800,000 out of a budget of about $26 million. That is a pretty significant amount. Since I am trying to get hired on full time, a budget cut is not good. I need a budget increase to have any chance at getting hired on at the college. I hope we can figure something out and quickly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary, Obama or Edwards?

Posted by Steve on Monday, January 08, 2007 1:57:15 AM
There are three main Democrat candidates for President. Hillary Clinton has the money and star power. Obama only has star power. Edwards has experience in the previous campaign.

From my perch in Arizona, I see Edwards as being a pretender. He earned his millions using junk science in court cases. His claim to fame was class action suits against doctors for causing birth defects. The birth defects were caused by the genetics of the victim or the actions of the victim. The doctor just happened to deliver a less than perfect baby. He would sue and get the doctor to settle. He is a real peach of a guy. He is obviously not Presidential material. Given the sad state of the Democrat party, he has a real shot.

Obama is a pretty face being paraded out by the media. He stands for nothing. He has done nothing. He has done cocaine while in college. His biggest advantage, he is black. If he was white, he would fade to nothing in a few weeks. Being black will keep him in the running much longer than he otherwise should be.

Hillary has the biggest pot of money. She has the Democrat machine. She has star power being female. The Presidential candidacy is hers to lose. She would also make the worst President. She is a confirmed Socialist. If she were elected, we may not have a country by the time she would be finished. A lot of people would lose their lives. Many would lose theirs by her minions. Many would lose theirs by her inaction to protect US interests. Many would lose theirs fighting Muslim extremists in the streets of the US. I guess the only good thing would be, population growth would end under her watch. I hope people wake up to the danger that she poses. I see no signs of that happening. That scares me for the future of the country that I love. I have heard rumors that the church members would have to save the country with the constitution hanging by a thread. This may be the thing that story was talking about. I always discounted that story.

My guess is that Hillary gets the nomination for President. She will pick Obama for vice. That would be a difficult ticket to beat. But, beat it we must.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vacation to Texas

Posted by Steve on Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:08:13 PM
Last night, I wrote a post about our trip to Texas. When I got finished, I clicked on spell check and Internet Explorer crashed losing all of the data. I got frustrated and went to bed. This is my second attempt to give my impressions.

On the trip out, we stopped in San Antonio and visited Sea World and The Alamo. We visited Sea World because of my 7 year old granddaughter. Last spring we visited Sea World in San Diego. In comparing the two Sea Worlds, we preferred San Diego. The reason is that San Diego had more things to see and less rides. San Antonio had more rides and less to see. It took us almost two full days to see everything in San Diego and only one in San Antonio. One big difference was the Shamu show. In San Antonio, the show was multimedia and relied on split second timing. In San Diego, the show was more on the animals and was paced for the animals benefit.

The next day we went to see the Alamo. Being from the west, I have not had many chances to see in person where historic events took place. For me, the experience was moving. After spending a few hours at the Alamo, we went to the Riverview mall across the street and saw the IMax movie, "The Alamo". After seeing the Alamo in person, the movie made more of a personal statement. After the movie we went on a boat tour of the river area. The experience was great. If I ever get back to San Antonio, we will be sure to do this again.

After San Antonio, we went up to Killeen and helped my daughter, her husband and new born son get ready to move. We packed up a trailer and left Killeen. We could not leave until 1 pm on Jan. 2. The court house opened at one and closed again at 4:45 pm. That was really strange. We traveled until late and spent the night in Fort Stockton. During the night, it rained. The next morning we had to stop about 120 miles from El Paso because of a 10 vehicle accident with two deaths. The estimate was 1-2 hours before the road would be open. After an hour, a trucker told me it would be another 2-3 hours before I-10 would be open. He was going to take a couple of back roads to get to El Paso. We decided to do likewise. That took us another 3 hours to get to El Paso. We got home around 9 pm.

Texas was almost like being in a strange country. For example, when changing freeways, I am used to changing from one to the other directly. In Texas, we had to travel on surface streets to change freeways. Another strange thing was where they placed their signs to turn. I am used to the signs for a turn to be placed just before the turn. In Texas, they are placed just after the turn. That caused some wrong turns on the trip. Their traffic lights are also horizontal, not vertical. They do have some that are vertical, but very few. That took a little getting used to, but was not a problem.

We are home now and posts will resume on a regular basis. Hope your holiday was good to you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christmas Eve

Posted by Steve on Sunday, December 24, 2006 9:37:47 AM
Today is Christmas Eve. It is early morning and all is still quiet in the Revie household. All is not quiet in the world. Hugh Hewitt is reporting about a war in Ethiopia. On the radio this morning, I heard a person say that you can take a globe and spin it. Then put your finger on the globe and any country you land on will be involved in some sort of conflict. There is definitely peace on earth.

Christ came over 2000 years ago to bring people closer to God. By bringing people closer to God, peace would be possible on earth. We have failed miserably in that goal. We can bring the peace to ourselves, which I believe to be the real goal. By following Christ's plan, we can achieve peace on earth for ourselves. It does not mean there will be an absence of problems. It means that by living how Christ wants you to live, you can know true salvation. That knowledge will bring you the peace that is talked about when they say, peace on earth.

Today in my home, there will be lots of family. Everyone is coming over for Christmas Eve dinner and present opening. Those of us living in our home will open the rest of the presents on Christmas day. Our Christmas Eve dinner is Lasagna. My wife makes the best Lasagna in the world. Everyone who has ever tasted it agrees. Missionaries who have had it will request it before they get transferred out of the area.

After Christmas, my wife and I are going to Texas to pick up my youngest daughter. She moved to Texas a year ago and has decided that Arizona is home. On the trip, I will probably not be able to do any blogging. So, I will post on Christmas and then not again until January 4.

Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Look at the Person

Posted by Steve on Saturday, December 23, 2006 10:54:32 AM
We have a number of people that are running for President of the United States. All of them think they are qualified to be President. All of them think they should be President. Only one will be the next President. Who will that be? We do not know the answer to that question at this time.

Looking at the candidates you have to look at the person and where they stand on the issues. As a conservative first, I lean toward the conservative candidates and away from the liberal ones.

As a social conservative, I believe that abortion is wrong. A candidate that supports abortion would not get my vote, unless both major candidates supported abortion. Looking at the candiates, that would leave only Mitt Romney and John McCain as the only major candidates that support the rights of the unborn.

Next, I am also a fiscal conservative. Looking at the candidates, Mitt Romney, John McCain and Rudy Giulani would qualify. John McCain is the weakest of the three in this category.

As a patriot, I support the war against Islamo-fascism. Mitt Romney, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani all qualify in spades in this category. All have strong records in supporting the war. Any one of the three would be an excellent choice in this category.

It is important to choose judges that would strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States. I do not want judges that would make up laws. All the Demcrats fail this test in spades. Mitt Romney is the strongest in this category. John McCain is suspect because of his leadership in the gang of 14. That gang of 14 situation stopped any chance of getting judges voted on  by the Senate. Rudy Giuliani is suspect because of his stance on abortion among other social issues.

Looking at a candidates personal life is also important. Mitt Romney has lead a life with almost no blemishes. John McCain and Rudy Giuliani have had problems with their wives. A man that cannot rule his own house will have trouble ruling the country.

Boiling down all these categories and you get Mitt Romney as the best candidate. Rudy Giuliani would be next. John McCain would be in third place, because you cannot trust him to do the right thing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Competition

Posted by Steve on Friday, December 22, 2006 1:54:46 PM
My sons and I started a fantasy football league a few years ago. My oldest son's wife joined to make 5 owners. We each manage two teams.

Each year the competition is fierce between all of us. We compare scores during games and call each other when we get ahead. We do have an established pattern of victories at the end of the season. I always have the first place team. I usually have one of the other three teams in the playoffs. My middle son always has two of the three lowest teams. My youngest son always has one team near the top and one near the bottom. My oldest son has his two teams near the top. His wife usually doesn't make the playoffs. I always lose in the first round of the playoffs.

Last year, the playoffs were my two teams playing my oldest son and his wife. I did my usual playoff swoon. My son's wife was the eventual winner. She has not let us live that down for the last year. Every time we get together for the last year, she somehow seems to mention that she won our fantasy league last year and is going to win i this year.

This year things were different. My middle son ended up just missing the playoffs. My youngest son and my oldest son's wife are playing for last place. The playoffs looked like usual. I had my two teams in the playoffs against my youngest son and my oldest son's wife (remember, we each have two teams). But, a miracle occurred, I won both games. My two teams are now playing for the championship.

I told the family that the Revie League trophy will now be where it belongs, in my den. It is home from its one year exile to my oldest son's house. The competition is all in good fun. Nobody gets angry. Nobody gets their feelings hurt. In my opinion, that is the way competition should be. Competition should be fun and exciting. But, competition should also be friendly.

Now, we just have to teach that to the NBA and NFL. Tempers have flared a little too much this past year. They should remember that it is a game.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Double Standard?

Posted by Steve on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:01:12 PM
Today, while running around, I heard Rush Limbaugh report on an airline that would not let an employee bring a Bible with her on a flight into Saudi Arabia. Here we scream if someone looks at us funny over something religious and an airline makes rules banning religious icons on a flight. That makes no sense.

I am not advocating that one approach or the other is right. I am trying to get to the point that there has to be some good middle ground. We should respect the rights of different religious groups to practice their religions. That does mean having their religious icons with them. They should also be allowed to pray when their religion deems it necessary. They should even be allowed to pray in whatever language they believe they need to use to communicate with God.

We should not bar the practice of any religion. As long as that religion does not advocate the overthrow of our government or the discrimination against any other religion, it should be able to practice whatever they want. This means that Muslims cannot advocate killing Jews or anything like that.

If we actually practiced that in the United States things would be much better. Advocates of no religion are trying to impose their non-religion on the rest of us. I have no problem with someone saying a prayer in public. This would include a prayer from a group I did not agree with. I  do not have to agree with a prayer being said in front of a group that I belong to. If the group occasionally lets my preference give the prayer, I would have no problem with anyone else giving prayers either.

I have no problem with a religious group putting up a religious display on public property. This includes religious groups with whom I disagree with. Just give my group a similar opportunity and everything would be just fine. That would satisfy any advocate of the separation of Church and State, unless that person was really trying to impose their religion on the rest of us. If the religion is Secularism, that is OK for the government to impose on others. We all have to follow the tenants of Secularism. All other religions have to bend their religion to agree with the Church of Secularism.

Religious tolerance should be the order of the day. We are living in a society that celebrates religious intolerance. We call religious intolerance, religious tolerance. Names of things are getting all mixed up. Things and ideas are not being called what they are, they are called some other name. That is confusing, until you realize that confusion is the goal.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Muslim Rejection of Terror

Posted by Steve on Monday, December 18, 2006 12:05:59 PM
We are over five years into the war on terror and are still waiting for Muslims to come out rejecting terrorism. Every now and then we hear one on the radio or in person. Today, we heard one on the radio with Laura Ingraham. But, there are far too few to make any difference. The ones that speak out are also individual citizens like me. They are not the big name leaders that have to make the statements to be effective.

If christians were committing acts of terror, there would be no shortage of important leaders speaking out against that tactic. There would be large protest rallies to protest against killing innocent people. All of that is lacking in this war on terror.

We are constantly told that Islam is a religion of peace. If that were true, we would not be searching for an Islamic leader to denounce killing innocent people. If Islam were a religion of peace, Muslims would be marching in the streets of every country denouncing Al Qaeda, Hezbollah and others that commit murders in the name of Islam. The silence is deafening. We are still waiting.

Islam has always spread by the sword. That has been true since the religion began. No country has ever voluntarily became Muslim. Every country that became Muslim did so either after being conquered,or by the threat of being conquered. There are some individual converts to Islam. They are relatively rare.

There are few living people that have left Islam as a religion. Why? Because if you leave Islam, you will be killed. Compare that to Christianity, there are a lot of converts to Christianity. There are a lot of people that are former Christians. Why? People are not killed when they leave a Christian religion. People are brought into a Christian church through love, not threat of death.

Looking at Islam as a whole one would have to conclude that the religion is not a religion of peace as practiced by current and former believers. It could be a religion of peace, if they practiced what they have written in their Koran. They would also have to remove the parts that allow them to kill infidels and apostates. But, it could become a religion of peace. As currently practiced by the Imams and Mullah's and other religious leaders, it is a bloody religion. There are killings going on all the time that are acceptable. A religion of peace would not allow these killings to go on.

Until Islam reforms itself into a religion of peace, I will consider it to be a religion of killing. It kills those that do not believe as they do. It kills those that stop believing as they do. It kills women that have been raped. It kills women that will not marry someone they do not want to marry. It treats women as second class citizens.

For all these reasons and more, I oppose Islam. I do not believe that a Muslim can be trusted with national secrets. Would their allegiance be to Islam or the United States? Until that is answered all Muslims have to be suspect. That does not mean all Muslims are bad. It just means they have to be checked out before they are trusted.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Personal Responsibility

Posted by Steve on Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:41:56 PM
Each of us is responsible for our own actions. We may try to shift blame onto others, but the ultimate responsibility for actions is ours. I am brought to this conclusion by the actions of my son. He worked until late last night. He had to get up and be somewhere by 7 am. Usually, I get up early and get ready, wake him up, and drive him there. Last night, he told me to not get him up as he had a ride there and he would get himself up.

When I got up at 7:15, he was still asleep. He missed the opportunity for service that he had at 7. He was responsible for getting himself up in time to be there by 7. It was not my responsiblity. He specifically told me not to get him up. He also specifially told me that he had a ride, so I did not have to get up to give him the ride.

My son may catch some flack for not showing up today. It was his responsibility to be there. If he had any doubts that he was going to make it, he could have asked me to get him up. I did wake up at 6:15 and rolled over and went back to sleep. I easily could have been awake. That was last minute, but early enough to give him time to get there. I feel sorry that he missed the chance, but it was his responsibility.

One good thing that happened for him missing this service opportunity, it rained this mornng. If he had gone, he would have been rained on for about 45 minutes. Not a long time, but enough to make things thoroughly miserable.

Responsiblity is something that is in short supply in the United States today. People are blaming others for their shortcomings. It is difficult to realize that you made a mistake. It is even harder to face up to that in front of others. It is so much easier to blame someone else for your mistake. That way the other person takes the blame for your mistake and you get off scot free.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christmas Shopping

Posted by Steve on Friday, December 15, 2006 4:32:43 PM
My wife and I just did some Christmas shopping at a church bookstore. We went there to look for a chapter book for my 7 year-old grand daughter, that we are raising, and a tie tack for my 33 year-old son.

Looking for the tie tack was interesting. My wife wanted a tie tack that just had "CTR" on it in an unobtrustive manner. We had a hard time finding anything like what she wanted. The best she could find was one that had "CTR" on a circle. It was nice, but very plain. The other problem is that it was a litle large for a tie tack. They also had some tie tacks that had "CTR" with softballs or footballs. I thought those were great. We ended up getting one with "CTR" on a football. I had to talk my wife into that one. She thought it too irreverant for my son to wear. I thought it something fun for him to wear.

Finding a chapter book for my grand daughter was more difficult. We searched a long time for one that was easy enough for her, yet having chapters. We ended up with a series called the "CTR Club". It is about a girl named Brittany. That is close to my granddaughter, Brianna. That will be fun for her to read. The trick will be getting her to start reading the stories. I think she will enjoy them once she starts.

We also picked up a key ring for my youngest son. It is an iron rod key chain. It will help remind him to hold onto the iron rod and remain faithful. That is hard in today's world.

Shopping with my wife is interesting. She is a better shopper. She gets better bargains. She also knows what she wants. But, she sometimes has a hard time seeing the fun in things. She is a type A personality and fun sometimes gets missed in her life. That seems to be my calling in her life, to bring a little "fun" into her life.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran's Holocaust Conference

Posted by Steve on Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:11:01 PM
Iran has been holding a conference on the holocaust for the past week. In the conference, the delegates have been questioning the validity of the holocaust. They do not agree that it even took place as written in the history books. They deny the pictures and stories of those that were there.

This is obviously a conference for nut jobs or as Hugh Hewitt would call them "Nutters". The holocaust did occur. We have pictures of the ovens with bones and ashes. We have testimony of the people that worked in the ovens. We have the testimony of those that buried the bodies. We have the testimony of those that managed to survive. The Germans even kept meticulous records that documented the killings. There can be no doubt.

Iran's brand of Sunni Muslim believes that Jews should not be allowed to live. They have no place on the earth. For them, it is easy to believe that the Jews made up the story of the holocaust. If the Jews made up the story, they could get sympathy of the nations of the world. They would get support to get their own country. For them to believe that it actually existed would be to admit that Jews are really people. That is not going to be acceptable to them.

To the Iranians, Jews are sub-human. As sub-humans, they should be exterminated so that true humans, Muslims, can populate the earth. Whenever one people believes that another people is less than human, they will allow any sort of atrocity to be committed. They will not think it wrong to murder the other group of people. The others are not human, therefore, they can be killed and should be killed.

I am not sure how they explain how the other group that is sub-human looks and sounds just like they do. There has to be some explanation, but it is beyone me to understand it. I believe that all people are sons and daughters of God. As such, they should be treated with the respect that a son or daughter of God would command. That world view also makes me incapable of understanding how one group can look at another group and call them sub-human.

What needs to happen in all cultures is to teach that all people are children of our Father in Heaven. If everyone believed that everyone else is a son or daughter of God, we would see a lot less mistreatment of people in this world. Would it stop it, no. People still make mistakes. People by definition make mistakes. We get mad and strike out or other stupid things. If everyone believed that everyone else was a son or daughter of God things would be better, not perfect.

The biggest better would be between nations. If all nations treated all other nations as equals, we would see less poverty and wars. We need governments to keep things in order on a local level. Nations are needed to keep things in order in a wider area over a more-or-less uniform set of circumstances. We do not need a world government. We just need cooperation between governments. We also need all governments to be modeled after the American or British examples. People should have a say in what goes on at a local level and in their nation.

Iranians are as far from that ideal as can be. They are even calling for the extermination of the State of Israel. That is unacceptable. We as Americans cannot allow that to happen. The Israeli government will never allow themselves to be wiped out. They will go down fighting, if they go down. We have to be standing beside them all the way.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12…2526272829303132333435Next »