About Me

Name:Steve
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Global Warming II

In the discussion on global warming, it was interesting to see the opinions. There were three groups represented, the true-believing global warmers, those that were open to new ideas and a couple that were skeptical about global warming.

The true-believers showed their hand in a post by one trying to soothe the discussion. She made mention that those that don't believe in global warming may have better science, but are less concerned about income distribution. In other words she was blaming all those that did not believe in global warming on disregarding the needs of the poor. She boiled it down to the real issue.

The real issue is money, not the environment. The Kyoto accord really only applies to one country, the United States. Other countries are impacted to some extent, but only minimally. Most big polluters are not even covered by the Kyoto accord at all. China, Russia and India are three of the biggest polluters in the world.  They are exempted from sanctions under the Kyoto accord. The Kyoto accord was the world trying to get into the pocket of the United States of America. The environmental movement is an attempt to get into the pocket of the US taxpayer.

To further illustrate the economic portion of the discussion, the talk was about riding horses to school instead of cars. The environmental movement would like to take the US economy and put it back into the 19th century. That would cripple the US and make us vulnerable to attack from any foreign power that might choose to do so. They envy our standard of living. They want to bring us down to the level of the lowest economy in the world. They are not interested in bringing the lowest economy up to our level. That would take too much work.

The adage is "follow the money". That is true when investigating a crime. That is true when finding out why someone supports a project. It also holds true in regards to the environmental movement. We should strive to raise all boats, not lower all boats to the same level.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming

On campus today, there is a discussion of Al Gore's propaganda film about an inconvenient truth. The discussion is funny. The non-scientists were all up in arms about the dangers of global warming until one scientist declared that global warming is a myth. The scientist at first questioned the validity of the movie. At that point the kool-aid drinking scientists chimed in about the dangers of global warming.

The brave scientist the cited sources and gave data about the fallacies of global warming. That took the wind out of everyone's sails. The people that believe in global warming still believe in global warming, they are just trying to figure out how to get back at the brave scientist that dared to question their faith.

Unfortunately for the brave scientist, he will now probably be denied any opportunity to get a job within the Maricopa Community College District by the global warming alarmists on his campus. He is a temporary faculty member on a one year only contract. That usually leads to a fulltime position at the end of the year or at most two years. The brave scientist is extremely talented and an excellent teacher. I have the opportunity to hear him teach his class on Thursday afternoons. I get to see him interact with students. He would be a great asset to the college district. I fear for his ability to get hired now.

People that believe in global warming are not going to be persuaded by logic or even by evidence. They believe in global warming because they have faith that global warming is true. No amount of evidence will persuade them of anything but global warming. It is a shame that the people on the left cannot allow people with differing opinions to exist anywhere near where they are. They scream for free speech. But, they mean free speech for themselves, not for anyone they disagree with.

The brave scientist above just questioned why Al Gore left out over 99% of the earth's history in looking at warming or cooling patterns. If he had looked at historical patterns, he would have discovered that it has been warmer in the past and it has been cooler in the past. There are regular patterns of heating and cooling. The patterns can be tracked. But to do so, would show the lie that global warming is something for us to worry about. It is, if it exists at all, a predictable climate pattern and will be repeated in the future.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Believe our Enemies

We spend a lot of money and time trying to find out what our potential and real enemies think. Right now, they are telling us. Like many who do not want to believe, we are saying, riiiiiight. Meanig, we do not believe them. We think they must mean something other than what they are saying to our faces. I believe that is a mistake of the highest order today.

Islamo-fascists do not care what we think or if we know what they think. They have spent a lot of time telling us exactly what they believe and what their view of the future holds for us and for the world. We have spent a lot of time debating among ourselves exactly what do they mean when they say they want the world governed by Islamic law. Do they mean we can keep our laws and they have their Islamic ones? No, they mean that they want everyone to obey Islamic law. When they say they want everyone to believe in Islam, we debate among ourselves who exactly are they talking about. Surely they are not talking about us converting to Islam.

We in the west have become delusional about the threat that faces us. We think that they believe like we do. We think that they want the same kinds of outcomes that we do. We could be no further from the truth. Islamo-fascists want us to convert to Islam or be dead. It is as simple as that. As long as the US holds a strong military, they will tiptoe around some of their goals. But, they tell us what they are all the time.

We have to believe them when they tell us that we are their intended target. No appeasement will ever work. No compromise will ever work. We have thrree choices, win by defeating them, dieing or converting to Islam. Those are our three choices. We need to decide TODAY which one we are going to choose. I for one choose the first one of winning. If I cannot win, I choose death. For me, there are no other choices available. What is your choice?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Personal Note

Something is wrong with me this weekend. For the second straigt week, I had problems on Sunday, getting to and staying at Church. I was visibly pale and weak. I had trouble standing and could not think clearly. This week, I actually made it to Sacrament meeting, but had someone take me home after the meeting.

I spent the rest of the day recovering. In fact, I am still in recovery mode today. That does not bode well for the semester. I have to recover faster or this semester will be a disaster. I will have to give up my lab tech job if I cannot recover. I enjoy that job, but I have to be able to teach, that is where the money is.

To compound the problem, I am not sleeping well. I have restless leg syndrome and it wakes me up after an hour or two of sleep. Then, I cannot go back to sleep right away, because my legs will not settle down enough to allow me to fall asleep. If I try to go back to bed before my legs will allow me, I toss and turn frequently until they gradually allow me to lay in one position long enough to sleep. Then in a couple of hours it starts all over again.

This is no way to run an airline. I am tired from working so hard. I need to get a good night's sleep to rest up for the next day and week. I do not get the good night's rest to allow me to recover enough to complete the tasks I am required to do. I do not know what to do to overcome this problem. I just needed to vent. Two weeks in a row is just too much for me to handle. I don't know what to do if I have a third.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Perception vs Reality

The recent war between Hezbollah and Israel was a smashing propaganda victory for Hezbollah. They were even crowing over the victory. Israel was showing all the signs of a beaten foe.

Now, a few weeks later the true facts are starting to emerge. Hezbollah got beaten far worse than they were/are willing to admit. And, if you look at what happened on the ground, Israel marched up and down Lebanon with ease. They lost men and equipment that they probably did not have to lose, but they still were kicking Hezbollah from one side of Lebanon to another.

So, Israel won the ground war and lost the propaganda war. We did much the same thing in Vietnam. We won the ground war, but because of the media picturing it as a defeat, we lost the propaganda war. Israel was put in much the same position with this war. They had almost no chance to win the propaganda war. The news media was set against them. In fact, the news media was actively working to support Hezbollah. The news media will deny that they were supporting Hezbollah. They will admit that they were against Israel, it amounts to the same thing.

Israel did much right in the war with Hezbollah. They relied too much on air power to actually win. They needed to be on the ground to root out the dug in Hezbollah fighters. Once they realized that fact, they sent in ground troops and were effective in rooting out Hezbollah. They should have kept up the offensive for at least one more week. They had Hezbollah set up for a knockout punch and did not deliver it. That was their biggest mistake.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nature of Opponent

Dennis Prager said something to the effect that the nature of the thing you fight determines the depth of your personality, or something similar. He was talking about Al Gore and his tilting at windmills over the non-issue of global warming, when there is a more important issue of islamo-fascism to deal with.  His point is that there are people out there that want to kill us, all of us. That should be the top issue on the minds of all people that wish to lead the US, or participate in any level. People that want to kill us now is more important than something that might possibly could maybe happen some time maybe in the future.

Islamo-fascism is the burning issue of our times. No matter how much the democrat party wants to sweep it under the rug, it is the most important issue. The islamo-fascists want to kill us now by any means possible. To argue whether we should be in Iraq or not is not the issue. Fighting them over in the middle-east is better than fighting them here in the middle-west, like Kansas. Personally, I would rather send my son and daughter off to fight the islamo-fascists in Iraq than have to pick up a gun to fight them in Phoenix.

We need to wake up and see the important issues of our time. Number one is to control and defeat the islamo-fascists on ALL fronts. Controlling our borders comes in second to defeating the islamo-fascists, but is related, because they could sneak across and kill us. What to do with the illegal aliens is of a lower importance than what to do with the latest islamo-fascist outbreak. We should control our borders to stop terrorists from coming across and spreading the war to our borders again.  If we cannot agree on what to do with the illegal aliens that are here now, put it on the shelf for a while until we can come to some agreement.

I do not know what is so difficult about identifying islamo-fascism as our number one issue. It is obvious to anyone who watches TV news that they want to kill us. And that is even with the news slanted to try to tell us we are not seeing what we are seeing.

Think, which is more important: something that could happen today, or something that has a low probability of happening in the next few hundred years. Make your choice, but make sure you are not making it because of who is in the White House. President Bush will only be President for a little over 2 years. We will be electing a new President in 2008. Let us hope the new President has as good a grasp of foreign affairs as our current President.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Honor

Honor is something that seems old these days. There was a time when honor meant everything. People would go out of their way to make sure that their honor stayed intact. Today, if it is not written down, it is not going to happen.

The time of a handshake sealing a deal is over. There are some of us old fogies left that still believe in keeping our word. But, for most people, their word means nothing. What brings this on is that I watched the movie "300 Spartans". For that Spartan king, his word was everything. He said he would defend Greece and he did. He could have made a half hearted attempt and made excuses, but he had to fulfill his word. Because he kept his word, Greece was able to defeat Persia in that war. That victory changed history and allowed Greece to develop the freedoms we enjoy today.

In contrast, my daughter-in-law bought a car and promised to pay. We co-signed because she had shown herself to be honest and hard working. As soon as she got the car, she started job jumping. She stopped paying for the car and now will not talk to us for any reason. She is not trying to live up to her word, she is trying to hide. That is not how I was brought up. I cannot understand how people will not stand up and be counted.

She is not unusual. We see people like her all around us. They are more concerned with getting all they can. They do not care who they hurt by not living up to their word. In my life, I have always tried to live up to what I promised to do. I have not always been successful in achieving what I said I would, but I always tried my best to do it. I have a hard time understanding people who do not do their best.

When we lived in North Dakota, it was not uncommon to see cars in parking lots idling with the keys in them and unlocked. In small towns everyone knows everyone. The crime rate is so low, people can do that. In fact, when we bought our first house in North Dakota, they could not find the keys for the house. The house had not been locked for years. In the larger towns in North Dakota, you still saw the cars running, but the houses were locked and the crime rate was higher.

My point is that we need to get back to the time when people had personal honor. When people believed in themselves and did what they said they would do. If we as a people did this, we would become so strong as a people, we could never be defeated. We would not be arguing over should we defend this country or not. There would be no question on direction. The disagreements would come on details not the big pictures. That would be an America I would like to see. Of course, I will never live long enough to see it. But it could happen again some time in the future. It would take some outside event so terrible, I do not want to be around to see it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DNA Evidence

It seems that Mark Karr is not the killer of JonBenet Ramsay after all. His DNA did not match the DNA found at the scene. That is a shame. He sure looked like someone who could have done it. But, DNA is pretty specific evidence. If the DNA does not match, you are not the one.

I saw an interesting list of things that define our times. One was that most people today have grown up with DNA evidence being used in court. It was not that long ago that DNA evidence was new. It was difficult to explain and OJ got off. His was one of the first cases using DNA. In my educated mind, the DNA evidence was damning. In the jury's eyes, the evidence was not. It was not, because there were a few hundred people that could have matched the DNA evidence used in OJ's trial.

In my mind, the fact the DNA evidence was found at the scene, in his car and at his house was damning. The jury could not grasp the fact that DNA evidence was found at all those locations. The odds that someone with OJ's DNA being at all those locations was extremely low.

Our ability to collect and use DNA evidence has improved in the last 20 years. We can now identify an individual much more specifically than we could in OJ's time. If the OJ trial were held today, I am afraid that he would be doing time in prison right now.

DNA evidence has made it possible for us to identify the criminal in cases where there is DNA evidence. It has made it possible to determine guilt or innocence of people before using other evidence. DNA evidence is more specific than a finger print. Both are unique to an individual, but DNA is more easily obtained. That makes it a bigger arrow in the quiver of the prosecution.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Faith

Reading the report about the reporters in Gaza that were kidnapped raised some questions. What if I was in that situation? If I was tied up with a gun to my head, could I affirm my faith, or would I wimp out and do what they did to live?

I would like to believe that my faith is so strong that I would not deny what I believe. I would continue to profess my faith in Jesus Christ and let things fall where they may. What would make me believe that I would not do that is the knowledge that I could say I was a muslim for the terrorist and deny that as soon as I was free. Everyone would understand that I had said it under duress. Anything said under duress would not be evidence of true belief.

But I would have to live with myself. If I said something just to live, I would forever brand myself a coward. I have lived a good life. It may be shorter, at this time, than I intend to live, but I could die and not regret it. That makes me believe that I would continue to say I believe in Jesus Christ. If I was 20 or 30 could I say the same thing, I will never know. I was never called to make that sacrifice. I will never know how I would have acted.

We do have to make decisions like that prior to being put in that situation. That is why we have to know what others are subjected to. We have to prepare ourselves for whatever may come our way. I believe their experience has enabled me to make the decision to continue to profess my love for Jesus Christ. I believe I will never ever deny my love for Jesus Christ. I have had time to prepare my mind for that eventually. Was I prepared for that eventually prior to the reporters ordeal, no. I am prepared today. That has made me a better person. I do not know what I would have said. I believe I know what I will say, if I am ever called to be in that situation. I hope I am never put in that situation or that my loved ones are ever put in it either. We have to be prepared for all situations, or satan will have his chance to defeat you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Morning After Pill

The FDA approved the morning after pill after many years of testing. It is supposed to give women an option after unprotected sexual intercourse. They can take this pill up to 72 hours after intercourse and not get pregnant. That sounds great for people who do not want to get pregnant. But things are not as simple as the proponents of the morning after pill say they are.

In countries where the morning after pill is in use, the incidence of pregnance is unchanged before and after the introduction of the pill. The incidence of abortion is usually about the same before and after the introduction of the pill.  That to me points to a pill that lulls people into a false sense of security and puts out false promises.

If the pill was really as effective as proponents say it is, after introduction, unwanted pregnancy would decline. Abortions would decline because of people using the morning after pill to rid themselves of the unwanted pregnancy instead of using abortion. Neither intended effect actually occurs. It may work for some individuals, but for society as a whole, it is a miserable failure.

I suppose that the morning after pill is better than an abortion. Not much better, but it is better.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pluto downgraded

It came as a surprise, though not as a shock, that Pluto was downgraded from a planet to something less. Pluto was always on the edge, literally. It was frequently denounced as too small for a planet, though it was acknowlwedged as such by the scientific community.

As  an Arizonan, I am appalled. Pluto was our time to shine. Pluto was discovered by a scientists working out of Arizona. According to calculations, every planet was not exactly where they should have been, unless you had a planet outside Uranus. After some searching where the calculations told him the planet should be, Pluto was discovered. It gave Arizona and the US something to crow about. It was the first planet found outside of Europe.

Now, to have us told that Pluto is not even large enough to be a planet! I am flabbergasted. It should have been grandfathered in on principle. I mean, we grandfather the French in as being important, Pluto should have received nothing less.

It would seem to me to be a simple thing to define a planet. The world body that defined planets, seems to have had a hard time defining exactly what was a planet. My mind tends to run along simple lines. These complicated discussions are lost on me. Simple is what I understand. Give me a simple definition and let me apply it to the planets and see what happens to each one. I would think that a college educated person like myself should be able to apply the definition of a planet that is given out by the world body discussing these things.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Foreign Affairs

How is it that your computer or components on your computer go out when you need them most? Yesterday, my computer modem went out and I had to wait until today to get it replaced. What a bummer. I almost could not live without my computer.

Well, August 22 came and went and the promised surprise on that date was really a fizzle. Everyone was predicting that some catastrophic event was going to occur on August 22. The "prophet" Mohammed was supposed to have done something great over 1400 years ago. It wasn't such a great trick back then and it would be an even less of a great trick today.

What gets me is that so many people believe what muslim clerics preach. If you put what muslim clerics say on paper, it looks like they are escapees from the looney bin. Nobody in their right mind could possibly believe this stuff. It boggles my mind that so many profess to believe it. The other thing is that muslim clerics so often disagree on doctrine. If they were preaching the truth, it would be evident for all to see. It would also be easy for all to understand exactly what was expected of them. Muslims have to be confused over the jumble of different things that their clerics are telling them. Of course, it could be the liberal media feeding me disinformation again, but I doubt it.

My greatest feat in the war with islamo fascism, is that we in the west do not have the will to win. We should easily defeat this group of fighters out of the 10th century. Our 21st century trained military should make short work of their third world army. But, we have the bleeding heart liberals that we have to appease. If we were allowed to fight the war the way it should be fought, Iraq would be over in a matter of weeks. Iran would be run by a democratically elected president early in 2007. Islamo-fascism would be a thing of the past by early 2007. Their string of disasters would lead even the most hardened militant to conclude that life as an islamo-fascist would be very short indeed.

Unfortunately, our leaders will never take the leash off our men and women in the military long enough to get the job done. I fear for the future of our western world. How long can we hold out against a foe that is ruthless, when we are not?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Family

Today's lesson in Priesthood was about the importance of the family. Our instructor indicated that the family is the basis of our culture. It is under fire from those that would destroy the very foundation of what makes America great.

A family is a marriage between a man and a woman. It has to be that and nothing else. Men and women are different. They bring different ideas, skills and responsibilities to the union. Women by their nature will bear the children. Men cannot bear children. They must provide for their wife and child(ren). Women will sacrifice part or all of their earning power to provide a nurturing place for their young children.

Some women will have to work to provide food and shelter for their families. That is part of reality. Some women go to work so they can have a nicer home or a better car. That is unnecessary and they should not work. They should provide a nurturing home for the children. When the children are grown, that is another story.

Some people will say that two men or two women should "marry". Why? They both bring the same things to the table. They can make some legal arrangements to acknowledge their standing. They do not need to "marry". Marriage is getting the government into personal lives.

The government has a stake in the union of a man and a woman. They can expect that children will result from that union. Children will become the citizens of this nation in the future. They need to be provided for and protected until they are old enough to provide for themselves. There needs to be legal protections for them until they have the education and emotional fortitude to be on their own.

Others will say that a man should be able to "marry" more than one wife. This should not be allowed by the state. A man can provide for one wife and her children. It is unlikely that a man could provide for the needs of two or more women and their children. In specials about polygamous families, they generally rely on welfare for part of the support for their families. There may be times and situations where polygamy may be practiced and needed. It is not needed in the United States of the 21st century.

A family consists of a man and a woman that are married. This marriage is sanctioned by the state. Any children that result from that marriage will be part of that family. They will be the responsibility of the parents to raise and teach them how to be productive members of society.

Since all of us are children, we should follow the 5th commandment to honor our father and our mother. We honor our father and our mother by obeying the law and becoming productive members of society. We should also honor our fathers and mothers by taking care of them as best we can. We should not look to strangers to take care of our relatives. We should take care of them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where is the Outrage

A Carter appointed judge last week, declared a key component of the war on terrror illegal. It was immediately appealed to a higher court and will almost certaintly be overturned. But, the interesting thing is the lack of outrage by the leaders of the Democrat party.

If the Democrat party were really as serious about security as they say they are, they would echo the Republican outrage of the judge's decision. But you hear only silence from the leadership of the Democrat party.

Left leaning blogs are jumping for joy over another loss for Bush. They cannot see the forest for the trees when it comes to Bush. To them, a loss for the United States is a loss for Bush. A loss for Bush is a win for the left. They do not see that a loss for the United States is a loss for all Americans.

There is a reason there have been no terrorist attacks since September 11, 2001 on American soil. One major reason is that we have been able to track terrorists and their bosses overseas using this wire tapping program. When a terrorist in the US contacts or is contacted by a terrorist overseas, we can listen to them discuss whatever they are talking about. This gives us the heads up on when and where to spend our limited funds and personnel to stop them from killing Americans.

The left seems to want to have Americans die to prove that we cannot stop them. That would not solve anything. There is no reason innocent Americans have to die if there is a way to stop it. So far, we have been able to stop terrorists from completing their plans. That is ok with me. If I am uninformed as to the details of how and why they were stopped. I don't care. Keep me in the dark for a while longer. When there are no more terrorists, then tell me how it all went down. Make movies, write books and spill the beans to your hearts content, until then keep quiet.

We should trust our government to keep us safe. It is fhe first priority of our government and they have been doing a pretty good job of it. That is no thanks to the left. They have to blab everything in prime time or on the front page of the newspaper, when they find out.

It just goes to show you that a vote for a Democrat at any level  is a vote to be less safe. They cannot be trusted with the reins of government at this time. When they grow up and join the real world, maybe they can again. At one time the Democrat party believed in real ideas. Now, they just believe that anything that Bush believes is wrong.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel/Hezbollah

Listening to the aftermath of the Israel/Hezbollah conflict, it is painfully clear who won. In sports, winners celebrate and pump their chests. Losers chip at each other and whine.

Listening to Israel and you get the impression that they lost. They are complaining and backbiting. They are making complaints of this problem or that problem. If they won, those problems would have been laughed at as badges of honor.

Hezbollah on the other hand has been celebrating. They are showing all the signs of someone who won a war or a game. They are glad handing each other and saying how they overcame huge obstacles to win the war. It doesn't matter that on the ground , the Israeli's were kicking some Hezbollah bootie. It doesn't matter that the Israeli's pushed Hezbollah back large distances. It only matters in the perception. Hezbollah's only goal in the war was to be there at the end. Israel had to score a knockout to win. They surely did not score a knockout.

The next time it will be more difficult for Israel to score a victory. Hezbollah will expect to win. They will be harder to dislodge. They will not be looking for the Israeli army to pull a fast one and destroy everything. They will expect their resistance to succeed in stopping Israel. They may even expect to take over Israeli territory. That would be a dreadful outcome for Israel. If that occurs, Israel would probably be finished as a country. They cannot give up land. They do not have enough land as it is.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive